Cybersecurity: expert calls for digital social contract (#13)

Show notes

In this episode of Swiss Cybersecurity Days, Tobias Bolzern talks to Nicolas Mayencourt, CEO of DreamLab Technologies, about the evolution of cybersecurity. Nicolas explains how the technology has evolved from a niche to the foundation of our society and emphasises the need to close security gaps in the digital infrastructure. He criticises Switzerland for acting too slowly despite the discovery of millions of vulnerabilities and reflects on the risks posed by foreign cloud providers. For the future, he calls for more secure technologies and a digital social contract that regulates rights and obligations in the digital space.

Show transcript

00:00:00: Welcome to this special episode recorded live at the Swiss Cybersecurity Days in Bern.

00:00:16: I'm Tobias Bolzern and today I'm joined by Nicolas Mayoncourt, founder and CEO of DreamLab Technologies.

00:00:23: Nicolas is a pioneer in cybersecurity and has been shaping the field for decades.

00:00:29: From his early days as a young hacker to building global security standards his insights into

00:00:35: digital threats and solutions are invaluable.

00:00:38: In this episode we will dive into the evolution of hacking, the growing cyber threats and

00:00:43: what it takes to build a secure and self-determined digital future.

00:00:47: What challenges do we face?

00:00:49: How can businesses and governments take responsibility?

00:00:53: And how can we protect ourselves in an increasing digital world?

00:00:58: Let's get started.

00:01:03: Nicolas, welcome to the show.

00:01:04: Thank you, lovely being here.

00:01:06: If you were to look at the first code you ever wrote, what would you think today?

00:01:12: That this was an inspiring and amazing personal moment to interact with the machine on machine

00:01:19: language level.

00:01:21: This actually defined my trajectory as a person and I just still am driven by passion about

00:01:31: technology and what this actually sparks in my mind is of course the picture of a young

00:01:40: human boy that has fun on a technical level, has fun being creative and innovative and

00:01:47: doing things without any limitation and conquering a new field, a technical field and at the

00:01:55: very same time it of course sparks the memory of the last 30 years I've been doing that

00:02:01: and what I see is that on one hand technology is moving fast and slow at the same time because

00:02:07: on that pure machine assembly level language not a lot has changed in the last 30 decades

00:02:14: but the whole environment has changed.

00:02:17: Whereas I would have seen myself as a technical worker 30 years ago, I still am today a technical

00:02:23: worker but we are not serving technical needs, we are serving societies.

00:02:29: You mentioned in your report Cyberspace Switzerland that over 2.4 million potential vulnerabilities

00:02:38: in Switzerland's infrastructure were discovered.

00:02:41: Which of those do you consider particularly critical?

00:02:47: Maybe let's start with first pre-finding or meta-analysis, we've been doing that now

00:02:54: for years.

00:02:55: It has become a tradition that we do this yearly and one of the most striking insights

00:03:03: to me personally is that we haven't really improved.

00:03:08: The amount and the consistency and the gravity of the vulnerabilities that we have across

00:03:14: sectors in Switzerland remains roughly the same compared to the last year.

00:03:19: So we are not really advancing, we are not really rectifying, we are not really addressing

00:03:24: the problems as we should.

00:03:26: And that to me personally is one of the most shocking insights and varying insights that

00:03:33: we are not actually progressing as we should as a society.

00:03:39: I mean I see if I look further away from Switzerland, I see many countries have a clear cyber strategy

00:03:46: but Switzerland often seems hesitant.

00:03:49: Why is that?

00:03:50: Do we need more pressure, more awareness?

00:03:52: What do you think?

00:03:54: That's a very, very good question and we did actually converse and talk about that in different

00:03:59: formats actually the last days also it was publicly discussed on a panel and the reasons

00:04:05: to that and the drivers, I wish I would know them all so we could actually name it and

00:04:10: address it.

00:04:12: So to give the clear answer I don't know but I can actually guess a little bit what are

00:04:17: the driving factors that are making us not move too fast.

00:04:22: And I think it's also a global phenomenon but with Swiss specificities.

00:04:30: So first let me tackle the global part.

00:04:34: Yesterday we had a consensus on the panel and we took the automotive and the aero industry

00:04:43: as an example.

00:04:45: So the car, the vehicles as well as the planes happened to be actually pretty safe.

00:04:53: Flying is the most safe way of transportation but that hasn't always been the case.

00:05:00: Up to the fifties flying was actually extremely dangerous.

00:05:05: Many, many, many people needed to die up until a real security culture has been put in place.

00:05:12: A positive security culture has been put in place and each and every incident has been

00:05:17: analysed and has been shared across all industries and society and actually ended up in regulations

00:05:24: improving the safety and security of that transport method.

00:05:28: Today this is the safest way to get transported.

00:05:32: So this evolution may be missing and I fear and I don't like to say this but I fear that

00:05:41: we are not pained enough to take the right decisions and to actually start that journey

00:05:47: faster compared to other industries where we have seen that evolution happening already.

00:05:55: So we may be just at the start of this process whereas we do know what would be needed technically.

00:06:01: We do know what would be needed in collaboration on the policy level and governance level yet

00:06:08: we are not really taking bold moves and we are not progressing fast.

00:06:13: So yesterday on a public panel there was unfortunately and I dislike that fact but it may be true

00:06:20: was the consensus that probably human societies need more pain to get moving in order to actually

00:06:29: really direct the answer for Switzerland.

00:06:31: I also think it's a bit a mix of different factors.

00:06:37: We are a wealthy and safe country so we don't feel any pain.

00:06:44: Still we are moving a little bit that's good but not enough.

00:06:47: So this is actually the pain factor but there are other factors in Switzerland and it may

00:06:51: also be our system our federated system with the direct democracy which I by the way love.

00:06:59: I love to be Swiss and I love that system but it may not be favorable for a centralized

00:07:07: baseline hardened cybersecurity posture because that actually means that we need to have one

00:07:14: rule and apply it to all the nation and all the federations on the national level on the

00:07:21: continental level on the community level on the critical infrastructure level in order

00:07:25: to create a sound cybersecurity posture.

00:07:29: So one we may not feel the heat two our system of a federated nation may complicate things

00:07:42: and three there may be also a cultural element to it.

00:07:47: We as Swiss we tend to be perfectionists we are on time we appreciate high quality but

00:07:55: I believe you are not yet very good at coping with mistakes or failures.

00:08:02: We are not very receptive to messaging like we have a vulnerability let's fix it.

00:08:09: Usually we don't like that that's what I see in the Swiss culture that we'd rather

00:08:15: prefer to hear good news as everybody does but we're not so good yet at coping with

00:08:21: failures or mistakes and actually just rectifying them.

00:08:26: Another trend I'm seeing emerging is that the Switzerland is increasingly relying on

00:08:33: say foreign cloud and security providers where do you see the biggest loss of control over

00:08:42: critical infrastructure if this continues.

00:08:48: much for that question. And that would be a question for a two hour conversation. I try

00:08:54: to make it as crisp and short as possible. You started with the term cloud, and we're

00:09:02: using foreign clouds. Now we have to visualize what actually is a cloud. I think the most

00:09:09: easiest way to put that, to make that understandable, it's basically your data on someone else's

00:09:17: hard drive. So basically what we're doing is you're putting our data on someone else's

00:09:23: hard drive. Now it turns out that the someone else is not within Swiss soil or jurisdiction,

00:09:30: which as a logical consequence means we are going to be depending even more and more on

00:09:37: the goodwill of the providers. Putting that in perspective with today's world and the

00:09:44: development, the geopolitical development and what we're seeing, what is happening globally,

00:09:50: that could be taking very, very high risks because the global, let's say, rules-based

00:09:59: world is disappearing more and more, is being stressed and challenged more and more, whereas

00:10:05: we see that a new, let's say, world order or a new power struggle is emerging, but it

00:10:13: isn't very clear who sticks to what rules and why, so I foresee this as a emerging and

00:10:20: big risk for us to take to actually park our data on somebody else's hard drive that happens

00:10:29: to be not in Switzerland. In other words, it also means that we at least partially submit

00:10:35: to foreign legislation, which is a direct contradiction to sovereignty. How can you keep sovereign

00:10:45: when your data is being governed by another jurisdiction? That just simply does not work.

00:10:50: So I do believe that we should deeply think about what we are doing and we should deeply

00:10:58: think about our risks and start to actually address them in a more strong way.

00:11:09: You've become one of the big advocates of cybersecurity. Cybersecurity is a very complex

00:11:16: topic yet sometimes it is on the mind because people still use passwords 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,

00:11:24: 5, what still drives you every day to get up and advocate for cybersecurity yet or still?

00:11:35: I can't help it. I was born that way. This is my life passion, so this will never fade

00:11:41: out. And what drives me, what drives me is what initially attracted me to this industry.

00:11:47: I do believe that with this innovation, society have the key in their hand to create a utopian

00:11:56: society. This technology can really help us a lot and fuel us and propel us to the next

00:12:03: level of evolution. And so this is my motivation to secure that development, to help to build

00:12:11: a sound cybersecurity posture to secure those innovations. And this will never leave me

00:12:20: resting up until we do that in a responsible and a secure fashion.

00:12:25: When you look back at this moment, let's say in 10 years time, what do you hope will have

00:12:31: changed fundamentally in digital security by then?

00:12:37: You're very well and good question. What would I hope would change? So there are different

00:12:46: layers to that. I think one on the technical layer, we have to overcome the cat and mouse

00:12:53: paradigm. We actually have to build true secure technologies. So the concepts that have been

00:13:02: driving the technology for the last 40 years, they were very good. They brought us to a

00:13:08: very, very big, impactful digital fabric. But they're fundamentally missing security

00:13:17: properties. And we have to build that and we have to overcome that paradigm. So I would

00:13:23: hope that we will take a next evolutionary step on the technical level.

00:13:28: Now, when I look at the businesses, humans and societies being built up on that digital

00:13:38: fabric, then I do hope that we can accelerate human evolution and that we can also go for

00:13:46: the next step and actually improve or evolve our societal contract to actually include

00:14:00: the digital. What do I mean by that? I mean by that that we have a society, we have laws

00:14:07: and we have a societal contract where every citizen, every individual has rights and responsibilities.

00:14:18: And that has worked very well for the last century in Switzerland. But now we have this

00:14:24: digital house, which is changing things. And so I would hope that we will start having

00:14:33: a digital societal contract where it is clear what a person has as digital rights, but also

00:14:42: as digital responsibilities, how it comes, how do we treat privacy? How do we protect

00:14:50: our children? How do we educate for the future? And how do we actually assure that we also

00:14:56: have a cyber peace globally? And how do we assure that our products that we're using

00:15:02: on everyday basis can be employed in a responsible manner so we can actually live up our duties

00:15:09: of being conducting responsible business and having a responsible society? So that is on

00:15:15: the regulative societal layer. And the third one, I know that human evolution tends to

00:15:22: be in very long cycles. So we have, as human embodiment, evolved our thousands of years

00:15:31: and we have mastered the physical dimensions. But now our innovation that we have done 70

00:15:36: years ago, the digital, the internet, digital fabric is actually overwhelming us. We don't

00:15:43: have a sensory access to that digital fabric. We don't feel when our devices get hacked.

00:15:50: We don't feel when they're happy or unhappy. And therefore, we are disconnected by our

00:15:55: own innovation. So I hope that this today pure cognitive space will become a new normal

00:16:04: so that every person being connected to the internet actually consciously understands

00:16:09: what is happening and consciously understands where are risks and chances and what are these

00:16:16: persons, individuals, responsibilities in that digital space?

00:16:22: One final question to go full circle. We're an audio podcast so people don't see this.

00:16:27: You're sitting here now in a suit, still black, but do you also still wear black hoodies?

00:16:34: So I was just using that image. I do actually like hoodies. But the stereotype of the hacker

00:16:41: being in the cellar with the black hoodie and the pizza has long gone, has long, long, long

00:16:48: gone. If ever existed, we don't know. I personally like hoodies. I also personally like actually

00:16:56: doing things like every normal human does. I enjoy social contacts. I enjoy sports. I

00:17:03: enjoy culture. And so I do believe that we have to get rid of that stereotype. And so

00:17:08: I'm very happy about that question. I do also like black, but that just happens to be a

00:17:15: personal choice.

00:17:16: Thank you, Niklas, for these insights and for being our guest.

00:17:21: Thank you so much.

00:17:22: And of course, a big thank you to you, our audience, for tuning in to this special episode

00:17:27: for the Swiss Cyber Security Days in Bern. If you enjoyed the discussion, don't forget

00:17:31: to subscribe. And until next time.

New comment

Your name or nickname, will be shown publicly
At least 10 characters long
By submitting your comment you agree that the content of the field "Name or nickname" will be stored and shown publicly next to your comment. Using your real name is optional.